1998 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1992 Renault Racoon

To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 885 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (461 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault Racoon has manual transmission. 1992 Renault Racoon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: