1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1972 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,293 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK (185 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1972 Toyota Corona. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1972 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 840 kg more than 1972 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK (271 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Toyota Corona. (166 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1972 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | SLK | Corona |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2293 cc | 2253 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1210 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2590 mm |
