1998 Mercury Villager vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercury Villager (149 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mercury Villager | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Villager | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2490 mm |