1998 Mercury Villager vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1998 Mercury Villager. (149 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercury Villager.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mercury Villager | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Villager | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
