1998 Mini MK VII vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1998 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1998 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 1019 kg more than 1998 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mini MK VII | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mini | Ford |
Model | MK VII | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6130 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1621 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2649 mm |