1998 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | Carisma | CTS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
