1998 Mitsubishi Carisma vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mitsubishi Carisma | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
Model | Carisma | CTS |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1422 mm |