1998 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 1966 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | 1966 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1076 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2290 mm |
