1998 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2010 Acura RL
To start off, 2010 Acura RL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura RL weights approximately 22 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2010 Acura RL | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
Model | Challenger | RL |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4971 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2799 mm |