1998 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2010 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2010 Lotus Elise is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Elise weights approximately 51 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2010 Lotus Elise | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Lotus |
| Model | Challenger | Elise |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 433 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1881 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4882 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1915 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1354 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2941 mm |
