1998 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 656 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2486 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3700 mm |
