1998 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 39 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Challenger | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1791 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2774 mm |
