1998 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Mitsubishi Colt 1996 Rover 200
Make Mitsubishi Rover
Model Colt 200
Year Released 1998 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1299 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 109 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 945 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2510 mm