1998 Mitsubishi Space Star vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 740 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star (174 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mitsubishi Space Star | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Space Star | 600 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2010 mm |