1998 Mitsubishi Space Star vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Because 2005 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star has manual transmission. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Space Star | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |
