1998 Mitsubishi SST vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi SST is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi SST should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 20 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi SST.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (296 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1998 Mitsubishi SST will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mitsubishi SST | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | SST | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |