1998 Mitsubishi SST vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi SST is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi SST should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi SST weights approximately 60 kg more than 1967 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (296 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Mitsubishi SST will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi SST | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | NSU |
| Model | SST | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2870 mm |
