1998 Mitsubishi SST vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi SST. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi SST would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (210 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi SST should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mitsubishi SST. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Mitsubishi SST | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | SST | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2490 mm |
