1998 Mitsubishi SST vs. 2007 Holden UTE

To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi SST. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi SST would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi SST. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi SST.

Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi SST, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi SST. (296 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi SST. 1998 Mitsubishi SST has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2007 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mitsubishi SST will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: