1998 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 369 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Because 1998 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara has manual transmission. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Nissan Cefiro | 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cefiro | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
