1998 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2012 Kia Forte
To start off, 2012 Kia Forte is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. Both 1998 Nissan Cefiro and 2012 Kia Forte are equipped with a 2,000 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 193 kg more than 2012 Kia Forte.
Because 1998 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Nissan Cefiro | 2012 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Cefiro | Forte |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 1241 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4481 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
