1998 Nissan Cima vs. 1996 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1998 Nissan Cima is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Cima weights approximately 504 kg more than 1996 Seat Toledo.
Because 1998 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Nissan Cima | 1996 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Nissan | Seat |
| Model | Cima | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
