1998 Nissan Crew vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1998 Nissan Crew is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Crew is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Nissan Crew (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Nissan Crew should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Crew weights approximately 225 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Nissan Crew (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1998 Nissan Crew will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Nissan Crew | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Crew | 220 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
