1998 Nissan El Grand vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1998 Nissan El Grand is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 758 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Nissan El Grand | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | El Grand | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
