1998 Nissan Gloria vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Nissan Gloria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Nissan Gloria would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Gloria is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 45 kg more than 1998 Nissan Gloria.
Because 1998 Nissan Gloria is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Nissan Gloria. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1998 Nissan Gloria has manual transmission. 1998 Nissan Gloria will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Nissan Gloria | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Gloria | Epica |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |