1998 Nissan Presea vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Nissan Presea is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Nissan Presea (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Nissan Presea should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1998 Nissan Presea.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 135 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Nissan Presea | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Presea | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |