1998 Nissan Presea vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1998 Nissan Presea is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1998 Nissan Presea. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 Nissan Presea.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Nissan Presea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1998 Nissan Presea has manual transmission. 1998 Nissan Presea will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Nissan Presea | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Presea | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
