1998 Nissan Presea vs. 2000 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Toyota Crown is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Nissan Presea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Nissan Presea would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Crown weights approximately 190 kg more than 1998 Nissan Presea.
Because 2000 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Nissan Presea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Nissan Presea | 2000 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Presea | Crown |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |