1998 Nissan Terrano II vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Nissan Terrano II (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 455 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Nissan Terrano II (197 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Nissan Terrano II | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Terrano II | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |