1998 Opel Omega vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1998 Opel Omega. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 Opel Omega.
Because 1998 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Opel Omega. (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Opel Omega | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Omega | E-350 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |