1998 Opel Tigra vs. 2012 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2012 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Opel Tigra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Opel Tigra would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Grand Scenic (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1998 Opel Tigra. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1998 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 601 kg more than 1998 Opel Tigra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Grand Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Opel Tigra | 2012 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Tigra | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2740 mm |