1998 Panoz Q9 vs. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Panoz Q9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Panoz Q9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 487 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. (191 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Panoz Q9 | 2006 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Panoz | Renault |
Model | Q9 | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |