1998 Panoz Q9 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. Both 1998 Panoz Q9 and 2008 Holden UTE are equipped with a 6,000 cc engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Panoz Q9 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Panoz | Holden |
Model | Q9 | UTE |
Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |