1998 Panoz Q9 vs. 2012 Audi Q7
To start off, 2012 Audi Q7 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi Q7. (550 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi Q7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Panoz Q9 | 2012 Audi Q7 | |
| Make | Panoz | Audi |
| Model | Q9 | Q7 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 550 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3002 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |
