1998 Panoz Q9 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Mustang. (379 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Mustang. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Panoz Q9 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Panoz | Ford |
| Model | Q9 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 379 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |
