1998 Panoz Q9 vs. 2012 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Panoz Q9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Panoz Q9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Seat Exeo. (320 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Seat Exeo. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 2012 Seat Exeo has manual transmission. 2012 Seat Exeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Panoz Q9 | 2012 Seat Exeo | |
| Make | Panoz | Seat |
| Model | Q9 | Exeo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2642 mm |
