1998 Peugeot 106 vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 1998 Peugeot 106 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,046 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Skoda L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 44 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Skoda L weights approximately 25 kg more than 1998 Peugeot 106.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Skoda L (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Peugeot 106. (70 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Skoda L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Peugeot 106 | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Peugeot | Skoda |
| Model | 106 | L |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 953 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |
