1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 1970 Volvo 140
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1970 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 1970 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Volvo 140 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Because 1970 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Volvo 140. (157 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Peugeot Tulip | 1970 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | Tulip | 140 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2610 mm |
