1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 1979 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Peugeot Tulip weights approximately 340 kg more than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. (41 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Suzuki Cervo. 1998 Peugeot Tulip has automatic transmission and 1979 Suzuki Cervo has manual transmission. 1979 Suzuki Cervo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Peugeot Tulip will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Peugeot Tulip | 1979 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Peugeot | Suzuki |
Model | Tulip | Cervo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 543 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 540 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2040 mm |