1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 1982 Simca 1100
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Simca 1100. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 1982 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Simca 1100 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Simca 1100. (86 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Simca 1100. 1998 Peugeot Tulip has automatic transmission and 1982 Simca 1100 has manual transmission. 1982 Simca 1100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Peugeot Tulip will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Peugeot Tulip | 1982 Simca 1100 | |
Make | Peugeot | Simca |
Model | Tulip | 1100 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1117 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 86 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 910 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |