1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 2007 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2007 Suzuki Reno is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Suzuki Reno (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 185 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Peugeot Tulip | 2007 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Peugeot | Suzuki |
Model | Tulip | Reno |
Year Released | 1998 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |