1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 2009 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 930 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (152 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio. 1998 Peugeot Tulip has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Peugeot Tulip will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: