1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (235 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 734 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (205 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.

Compare all specifications: