1998 Peugeot Tulip vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 3 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (183 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Peugeot Tulip | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | Tulip | 3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |