1998 Plymouth Neon vs. 2012 Holden Epica

To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Neon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Plymouth Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Neon. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Neon.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Neon. (174 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Neon. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1998 Plymouth Neon has manual transmission. 1998 Plymouth Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Plymouth Neon 2012 Holden Epica
Make Plymouth Holden
Model Neon Epica
Year Released 1998 2012
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 131 HP 148 HP
Torque 174 Nm 320 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 4805 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2700 mm