1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 1963 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,600 cc, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (115 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1963 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (153 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm). This means 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | 1963 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Plymouth | Triumph |
| Model | Pronto Cruiser | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1147 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2110 mm |
