1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 1969 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,600 cc, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (115 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1969 Triumph Herald. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph Herald.
Because 1969 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (153 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | 1969 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Plymouth | Triumph |
| Model | Pronto Cruiser | Herald |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1145 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2320 mm |
