1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 1970 Rover 2000
To start off, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (115 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1970 Rover 2000. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1970 Rover 2000.
Because 1970 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Rover 2000 (173 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 1970 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | 1970 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Rover |
| Model | Pronto Cruiser | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1978 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |
