1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 1,600 cc, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (115 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser (153 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Plymouth | Renault |
| Model | Pronto Cruiser | Clio |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1149 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |
