1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser vs. 2010 Cadillac STS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.

Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. 2010 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser has manual transmission. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: